![]() The first astronaut of Germany and a Saudi prince also went to space by shuttle. A year later another US senator came aboard the STS-61C mission as a “passenger” - Bill Nelson. He demonstrated such an epically poor adaptation to weightlessness that NASA engineers later named a humorous figure in his honor that symbolizes disability in space. The large capacity of the shuttles and the short nature of their flights also allowed NASA to include “passengers” in their crews - people whose skills, so to speak, was not critical for the success of the mission, but their stay in space was necessary for political reasons or to strengthen relations with foreign partners.įor example, in 1985, US Senator Jacob Garn went into orbit as part of the STS-51D mission. Such operations in space were not performed before or after. Even 35 years later, reports of some of the early missions of reusable ships, when astronauts went into outer space without insurance files to catch satellites, really look like episodes from science fiction movies. Also, shuttle crews could be used as space installers - for the assembly of large structures (such as the Freedom orbital station). For example, shuttle crews could repair satellites directly in space or, if necessary, remove cargo from orbit and return it to Earth. Despite the compromising nature of the system, it has provided NASA with a number of truly unique capabilities. Winged spacecraft first went into space in 1981. It lay 20 km from the shore at a depth of more than 20 m. A fragment of the right wing of the Challenger, lifted from the ocean floor by a team of divers of the warship Opportune. This context is important for understanding the causes of the tragedy. Dizziness with successīefore moving on to the Challenger disaster and its aftermath, we need to discuss how the Space Shuttle program developed before 1986. The disaster had huge consequences for both the Space Shuttle program and all of American astronautics, forever dividing it into “before” and “after”. The launch was broadcast live, so all viewers learned about the tragedy immediately. In the 73rd second of the flight, when Challenger was at an altitude of 15 km, it suddenly turned into a huge fireball. Unfortunately, all that was not the reason why the STS-51L mission went down in history. NASA has come close to such a desirable goal as launching shuttles into space at intervals of a couple of weeks. And secondly, the Challenger was launched only 16 days after the previous space shuttle. She had a mission to conduct several televised lessons when the shuttle was in orbit. ![]() First, one of its participants was schoolteacher Christa McAuliffe, who won the Teacher in Space competition (more than 11,000 people took part). The reusable ship Challenger rose into the cloudless sky with a crew of seven astronauts on board.ĭespite the generally routine nature of the mission, this flight was considered interesting for several reasons. This sound marked the 25th launch of the Space Shuttle system. In some ways, the loss of Columbia affected me more deeply than Challenger.In the morning of Janusolid-fuel boosters and RS-25 engines roared on the territory of the Kennedy Space Center. Another decade passed and, now a teacher myself, I returned to my school one cold Monday morning to explain to my pupils what had happened to Challenger's sister ship, Columbia, a few days earlier. Five years later, I gave a speech on the STS-51L disaster to my teacher as part of my GCSE English assessment. In September 1988, aged 11,1 came home from school to watch STS-26 return the Shuttle fleet to orbital operations. Admittedly, my fascination with rockets and astronauts, stars and planets had begun several years earlier, but Challenger's destruction turned it from an occasional hobby to a fascination which has remained with me ever since. I watched the entire horror unfold live on all of the network stations. My parents were, at the time, midway through moving house and, luckily, the TV was one of the few domestic items still to be packed. Ironically, the loss of Challenger in January 1986 fired my interest in space exploration more than any other single event.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |